@article{oai:keisen.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000490,
 author = {丸山, 桂 and マルヤマ, カツラ and MARUYAMA, Katsura},
 journal = {恵泉女学園大学人文学部紀要, Keisen University Bulletin},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), The purpose of this study is to compare of women's pension systems, among nations especially with a special reference to contribution of homemaker and survivor's pension system. The current pension system seems to assume that women rely on men for their income in retirement. Wives over state pension age receive a derived pension as a proportion of their husband's entitlement in U. K., U. S. A and Japan. Although such spouse pensions give benefit to married women by ensuring some personal income in their later life, they discriminate against dual-earner couples because married women entitled to a small pension in their own right receive no more than a lifelong homemaker life. As the increasing of part-time workers, the treatment of part-time workers is important. In Japan, the access of part-time workers access to occupational pensions is difficult compared with other countries. And the trends of reform of survivor's pension system are aiming to equal treatment with men and women, and cut the benefits for budget reasons.},
 pages = {79--94},
 title = {女性の年金に関する国際比較},
 volume = {15},
 year = {2003}
}